Skip to main content
CLUB BUSINESS

£852m and Counting: Man City's Ruling Puts Manchester United's Ownership Bill Back Under the Microscope

Swiss Ramble's estimate of £852m in Glazer-era net interest at Manchester United has landed next to the £830.69m disguised funding figure in the Man City ruling — roughly £800m in, £800m out, and two very different ownership bills.

Published 6 Oct 20263 min read

IKInes KovačFootball business and governance correspondent

The Premier League commission ruling that Manchester City disguised £830.69 million of owner funding as sponsorship income has produced an uncomfortable piece of symmetry across town: football-finance analyst Swiss Ramble now estimates that Manchester United have paid around £852 million in net interest since the Glazer family's leveraged takeover in 2005. The two numbers, roughly £800 million in and £800 million out, frame the opposite answers Manchester's clubs offer to the same question — what an owner's money does to a football club.

The comparison, set out by the BBC and picked up by the Daily Star and other outlets in the days after the commission's verdict became public, is less about moral equivalence than about attention. City's case turns on money the Premier League says should never have counted as commercial income; United's is the long-running cost of a purchase structure that loaded debt onto the club from day one. United have not been accused of breaking any rules — but the scrutiny the City verdict trained on club finances has landed on Old Trafford's balance sheet too.

The interest bill nobody planned for

United were debt-free when the Glazers completed their buyout in 2005, funding the purchase largely with loans secured against the club. Two decades later the interest has compounded into what Swiss Ramble puts at £852 million in net payments — money that left the club's accounts without buying a single player, and a figure that now sits alongside the £122.8 million in potential contingent contract payments United have disclosed on top of their committed squad costs.

The wage bill tells the same story of a club carrying its structure. United's wages stood at £313 million in 2025, the fifth highest in the Premier League, and dropped to £302 million for 2025-26 in a season without European football. Revenue remains among the largest in the game, but it must service debt, meet transfer instalments and fund the planned 100,000-seat stadium — three claims on income that most rivals do not face in the same combination.

The commission's decision contained clear material errors of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe.— Manchester City appeal statement, as reported by the BBC

A rule change that came too late

The Glazer model would be harder to repeat today. In June 2023, Premier League clubs voted to cap future leveraged buyouts at around 65 per cent of a club's value, a move widely read as a response to ALK Capital's takeover of Burnley in December 2020. No such guardrail existed in 2005 — and United's supporters have not let the point pass quietly, staging their latest ownership protest before the home defeat by City on 13 September.

For City, the immediate fight is the appeal. For United, there is no verdict to wait on: the £852 million is already spent, the debt is still on the books, and the new stadium plan means the balance sheet will stay the story for years to come. The City scandal has simply made the whole city read its clubs' accounts more carefully.


Reported by Ines Kovač for OneLightScore, based on BBC Sport's £800m in, £800m out analysis, Daily Star reporting and Swiss Ramble's published estimates. No cover image: published without one pending a licensed photograph.

In this story

SoccerPremier LeagueManchester United FCManchester City FC
TagsClub BusinessManchester UnitedGlazer OwnershipManchester CityPremier LeagueFinancial Rules